The Silent Jay for Selke Campaign: Now with statistics!
Brian,also known as the one man band that is the St. Louis Blues Prospect Department on St. Louis Game Time, compiled some stats into chart form that were collected by fellow Game Timer icion which make a good argument for why passing McClement over for the Selke is a mistake. Basically, they compare Jay to last year's three nominees: Pavel Datsyuk, Ryan Kessler, and the winner, Jordan Staal. It makes Jay look pretty damn good. Witness (chart from Game Time). McClement was on the ice for the fewest goals allowed (the amount of GA Kessler was on ice for is fairly embarrassing for a Selke nominee), led in shorthanded time on ice (again, look at Datsyuk's numbers - best defensive forward year in and year out, and he's not even on the penalty kill?), did more with less per the "quality of teammates" stat, blew everyone else out of the water in faceoffs won shorthanded, and generally killed when it came to the PK. Also, he took only 22 penalty minutes all season, which is important when you're a penalty killer. Datsyuk's 18 makes him a candidate for the Lady Byng, not for the Selke. Kessler took so many that it's a wonder he got so many minutes shorthanded.
Honestly, why isn't being a penalty killing forward all but mandatory when you're considering the Selke award? The best defensive forwards on a team are usually the ones out there on the PK. Yes, a solid well rounded forward plays defense at all times, like Datsyuk, but to specifically be considered a defensive forward, you should have a job that qualifies you. Leading all players in shorthanded ToI IN THE LEAGUE should qualify you. Silent Jay is qualified.
| Player | Jay McCLEMENT | Pavel DATSYUK | Ryan KESLER | Jordan STAAL |
| Even Str ToI | 1056 | 1303 | 1164 | 1159 |
| Even Str GA | 43 | 44 | 61 | 45 |
| Minutes per ESG | 24.50 | 29.60 | 19.08 | 25.70 |
| Shorthanded ToI | 306 | 59 | 218 | 274 |
| GA while S/H | 24 | 6 | 21 | 29 |
| Min per GA while S/H | 12.75 | 9.80 | 10.30 | 9.44 |
| Quality of Competition | .062 | .029 | .030 | .044 |
| Quality of Teammates | .054 | .364 | .020 | .155 |
| Relative QCm/QTm Ratio | 1.070 | 0.554 | 0.896 | 0.903 |
| Giveaways | 28 | 73 | 28 | 31 |
| Takeaways | 39 | 132 | 83 | 41 |
| Shots Blocked | 52 | 33 | 73 | 41 |
| Hits | 66 | 89 | 95 | 121 |
| S/H Faceoffs W | 189 | 27 | 118 | 118 |
| S/H Faceoffs L | 231 | 29 | 123 | 148 |
| S/H FoW % | 45% | 48% | 48% | 44% |
| E/S Faceoffs W | 503 | 447 | 530 | 468 |
| E/S Faceoffs L | 470 | 362 | 429 | 495 |
| E/S FoW % | 51% | 55% | 55% | 48% |
| Penalty Minutes | 22 | 18 | 104 | 57 |
| Games Played | 82 | 80 | 82 | 82 |
| Games per Minor Penalty | 7.50 | 8.80 | 1.57 | 2.80 |
| S/H Points | 0 G, 2 A | 0 G, 0 A | 1 G, 2 A | 1 G, 3 A |
